When it comes to building APIs, GraphQL and REST are two popular options. REST has been around for a long time, while GraphQL is newer and praised for being more flexible. But which one works better for advanced needs or handling performance issues?

In this blog, we’ll look at how GraphQL and REST compare in real-world situations. If you’re deciding which one to use or just want to learn more, this guide will break it down in simple terms to help you understand.

What are GraphQL and REST, and how do they differ in API design?

When it comes to building APIs, GraphQL and REST are two widely used approaches, each with its own strengths. Understanding their differences can help you choose the best fit for your project.

What is REST?

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style that relies on standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE. In REST, resources are represented by URLs (endpoints), and each endpoint is designed to perform a specific action. While REST is simple and widely supported, it can sometimes lead to inefficiencies, such as over-fetching (getting more data than needed) or under-fetching (missing data, requiring additional requests).

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is both a query language and a runtime for APIs. Instead of exposing multiple endpoints, GraphQL offers a single endpoint where clients can request exactly the data they need. This precise data retrieval reduces inefficiencies and gives developers more control. Additionally, GraphQL comes with built-in schema definitions and introspection, making it easier to understand and explore the API.

Key Differences

Endpoints: REST uses multiple endpoints for different resources, while GraphQL consolidates everything under one endpoint.

Data Fetching: REST can be rigid, sometimes causing over-fetching or under-fetching. GraphQL allows clients to specify exactly what they need.

Flexibility: GraphQL’s schema and introspection make it developer-friendly and highly flexible for complex queries.

GraphQL stands out as the best query language out there. Let’s get to know the benefits of using GraphQL. 

Benefits of using GraphQL over REST in modern web applications

Here are the benefits:

Efficient Data Fetching: GraphQL minimizes over-fetching by letting clients specify the exact data they need.

Single Endpoint: Simplifies API management and integration.

Schema-Driven Development: Strongly typed schemas improve API reliability and ease of use.

Real-Time Updates: With GraphQL subscriptions, real-time data streaming is seamless.

Tooling and Ecosystem: Tools like Apollo Client, Relay, and GraphiQL enhance the development experience.

But there are some areas where REST is still preferred over GraphQL

Simple APIs: REST is simpler to implement for small, straightforward APIs.

Caching and CDN Integration: REST's URL-based structure integrates well with CDNs for caching.

Security Compliance: REST APIs are easier to align with strict regulatory requirements in certain industries.

Legacy Systems: REST remains the de facto choice for maintaining and extending older systems.

Advanced GraphQL Features for Optimizing Web APIs

Query batching and caching in GraphQL to reduce server load

GraphQL supports techniques like query batching to combine multiple queries into a single network request. For caching, tools like Apollo Cache and Persisted Queries help store query results on the client side.

Example:

import { ApolloClient, InMemoryCache } from '@apollo/client';

const client = new ApolloClient({

 uri: 'https://example.com/graphql',

 cache: new InMemoryCache(),

});

How to implement GraphQL subscriptions for real-time data

GraphQL subscriptions enable real-time updates via WebSockets. They are ideal for chat apps, live notifications, and collaborative tools.

Example:

import { split, HttpLink } from '@apollo/client';

import { WebSocketLink } from '@apollo/client/link/ws';

import { getMainDefinition } from '@apollo/client/utilities';

const httpLink = new HttpLink({ uri: 'https://example.com/graphql' });

const wsLink = new WebSocketLink({

 uri: 'wss://example.com/graphql',

 options: { reconnect: true },

});

const link = split(

   ({ query }) => {

     const definition = getMainDefinition(query);

     return definition.kind === 'OperationDefinition' && definition.operation === 'subscription';

   },

   wsLink,

   httpLink

);

Handling complex data queries and pagination in GraphQL

GraphQL simplifies handling nested data and implementing pagination with arguments like first and after.

Example:

query GetPaginatedItems($first: Int, $after: String) {

 items(first: $first, after: $after) {

   edges {

     node {

       id

       name

     }

   }

   pageInfo {

     endCursor

     hasNextPage

   }

 }

}

Using GraphQL directives for custom query optimization

Directives like @include and @skip dynamically control query execution.

Example:

query GetUser($includeAddress: Boolean!) {

 user {

   name

   address @include(if: $includeAddress)

 }

}

Limitations of REST and How to Overcome Them

Challenges of over-fetching and under-fetching data in REST APIs

REST endpoints often return either too much or too little data. This inefficiency is resolved by introducing filtering and query parameters.

Example:

GET /users?fields=name,email&age=30

Code examples for handling REST limitations using filtering and query parameters

Filter responses by fields or apply server-side pagination to limit data payload.

Example:

{

 "data": [

   { "id": 1, "name": "John", "email": "john@example.com" },

   { "id": 2, "name": "Jane", "email": "jane@example.com" }

 ],

 "pagination": {

   "next": "/users?page=2",

   "total": 42

 }

}

Best practices for versioning REST APIs without breaking existing clients

• Use versioning in the URL: /v1/users
• Provide backward compatibility for older clients.
• Deprecate versions gracefully with clear timelines.

Real-world examples of migrating from REST to GraphQL

Transitioning from REST to GraphQL involves building a GraphQL server alongside the existing REST API and progressively replacing endpoints.

Example Tools:

• Apollo Server: For building GraphQL APIs.
• GraphQL Mesh: To integrate existing REST APIs into a unified GraphQL schema.

Performance Considerations for Choosing GraphQL vs. REST

Performance trade-offs: Is GraphQL always faster than REST?

GraphQL can reduce the number of API calls but increases complexity on the server. REST, with caching, might outperform GraphQL for static or predictable data.

How to optimize query performance in GraphQL using databases like PostGraphile

PostGraphile auto-generates a performant GraphQL API based on your database schema, allowing for optimized queries.

Example:

npx postgraphile -c postgres://user:password@localhost/dbname --watch

Best practices for caching and optimizing REST APIs

• Use HTTP headers (Cache-Control) for client-side caching.
• Integrate CDNs for caching static content.
• Implement server-side caching with Redis or Memcached.

Final Verdict

In conclusion, both GraphQL and REST offer unique advantages depending on your application’s needs. GraphQL excels in flexibility, efficiency, and handling complex queries, making it ideal for dynamic and data-intensive applications. REST remains reliable for simpler APIs, static content, and caching with CDNs. 

By understanding their strengths and limitations, developers can choose the right tool, optimize performance, and ensure scalability for modern web applications. The choice ultimately depends on your project’s goals and requirements. Head to Techdots to choose the API that best fits your project. 

‍